Send As SMS

planningblog

"The small, ordinary freedoms of life are priceless." PJ O'Rourke

Wednesday, November 30, 2005

More Optimism

These are the last two paragraphs on 'Iraq the Model's' most recent post:

"The international community has to rise up to the level of the responsibility this time and has some guts to be actively involved in monitoring the elections…well, that’s if the world really cares about peace and democracy in this country.

Anyway, I am still optimistic about the future and although I do not think the next election alone can fulfill our ambitions but our people and our democracy matures a little more with every step like this."

Read the whole thing here.

Does he mean Eason Jordan?

In an article at New York magazine, Jonathan Klein, the head of CNN is quoted as saying:

“Within five years, people will be saying, ‘I want the news about Jordan,’ and they’ll type ‘Jordan’ into their handheld device and up will pop the news about Jordan that they want, nothing else,” says Klein as he sits opposite the panel of anchor-filled screens broadcasting the news in the format that has worked well for the past half-century. “There won’t be anchors. There won’t be people introducing the stories. Consumers won’t have the time or the need for that. They’ll just be getting the news they want, when they want it, in whatever form they want it.”

Read the whole thing here.

Look out for this:

"a scandal surrounding a Rather story on 60 Minutes that turned out to be based on possibly phony documents."

What he doesn't add is that consumers will want the news from sources they trust. So if I google Eason Jordan in five years, I won't click through the link to the UK Guardian, say, or the NYTimes.

If I'm interested in whether documents are "possibly" false though, I now trust Little Green Footballs completely.

Plus I believe there will be people presenting the news in all the media categories. They will be characters who are clear about their biasses. No pretending to be objective. I hope there's a spectrum of personality types from warm and motherly, to sharp tongued and professorish. Just as there is in the non-fiction book category.

One of the first English put downs I ever learned when I moved here was "ah, but consider the source".

Eight thousand A Day

I know it's hard to think in terms of concepts.

It's much easier to flick on the tv and passively watch video footage of the latest Iraq war atrocity.

You ought to ask yourself - why are the tv news shows supporting the vile terrorists who have filmed their work? Why do millions of viewers tune in, allow themselves to get brainwashed and then get impassioned about the latest barbarity, which proves to them that the Iraq war is not being waged successfully.

Main stream media has figured out that filmed images supplied by terrorists are more mentally stimulating than verbal reports of...I'll tell you in a minute.

What happens is blood pressure goes up, brain synapses fire more actively and a few tv commercials are watched in a heightened state of awareness.

This isn't Advertising 101 because we don't talk about it much in advertising.

Recent research is being quoted in the latest edition of Campaign magazine and I realised the underlying strength of the findings - stimulated brains watch tv ads more keenly.

" 'X' has completed a neuro-marketing study that monitored the brains of tv viewers while they watched ads. 'X' said the survey demonstrates that ads scheduled to appear around relevant programmes are 24% more likely to stimulate activity in the parts of the brain linked to advertising effectiveness."

p.10 UK Campaign Magazine, 25 November 2005

One of the ways to judge research findings is if you then say to yourself "well, doesn't that make sense".

The defining image of the 'War on Terror', for me, will not be one of the dramatic still photos of a plane hitting a twin tower. That day a conference of top photographers was taking place there, so it's no wonder there are so many stunning photographs. New York is an important media centre heaving with amazing creative talent and the latest film equipment so it's obvious why we have dramatic film images from September 11th. Those images support the change in attitudes that have followed.

The image that rocks my world is imbued with humanity and heartbreak. Seeing it started me down this road, writing my opinions and posting them on the world wide web. I've imagined the actions before and after the photograph was taken many times. It runs like a movie in my head. Taken by a fledgling photographer, it cuts through the noise and smoke and mirrors of the main stream media's manipulation of my brain cells and provides me with strength and courage.

www.michaelyon.blogspot.com

Click that and you come to the photograph of baby Farah, it's right on Michael Yon's main page these days, rightly so. Just as Anne Frank has come to represent the horror of the Nazis systematically killing children in the gas chambers, little Farah represents to me the horror of letting cruel media images shape my understanding of what is going on in Iraq and the Islamofascist world.

She will not be allowed to grow up. She was torn apart by the shrapnel cynically added to the bomb set off by a brainwashed suicide murderer. She did not die gently in the arms of her mother but she did die in the arms of someone who loved her and is willing to fight to the death to stop what happened to her happening to other toddlers.

The meaning of life? We're here for the kids. Everything else is just icing on the cake

8,000 a day? The number of 5, 6, 7 year old girls who's genitals are mutilated EVERY DAY, because of medieval religious beliefs. A conference was held last Friday, supported by UNICEF, read the whole thing here.

There's no compelling video footage of that kind of thing and thank goodness. You have to THINK instead. Ask yourself, what else does the media get wrong, in terms of emphasis, in terms of time devoted to a subject. In terms of free advertising for terrorists. In terms of brain excitement rather than public service news reporting.

Yes, bit of a theme of mine I know.

Pushback!

The Pushback blogger of the day is Linked in USAF. It's early morning this side of the pond so that contribution won't be up for a little while. I'll update with a link.

Pushback Update:

Here are a few edited highlights from today's pushback post by Linked in USAF, read the whole thing here:

"OPTIMISM is almost non-existent in the MSM OSM LAME PMM (Prevaricating Media Machine)....we must lead by example and fight with the greatest power in the universe: optimism."

"...great orators spoke in positives, brimming with optimism, and promoting a vision that everyone can understand. If I say the following names, do you associate pacifism, derision, or pessimism with these names:

Thomas Jefferson
Abraham Lincoln
Theodore Roosevelt
Winston Churchill
George S. Patton
Dwight D. Eisenhower
Bernard Montgomery
Henry Kissinger
Kelly Johnson
Margaret Thatcher
Ronald Reagan

The true measure of a leader is their ability to drive optimism to the core and never take their eye off the ball."

To that list I would add:

Queen Elizabeth the First
John Adams
Paul Revere
Tony Blair

I'm not so sure about Monty and Kissinger, but I'm willing to be persuaded with a good argument.

Do follow the link and go have a read. There are some great lines that made me laugh out loud. You know, I had a Barbie, all those tiny outfits were wild and her black tulle dress was my favourite.

Tuesday, November 29, 2005

I'm at a place called Vertigo

Week Two of Andi's Pushback and today airforcewife has put up an article by someone with inside knowledge of the "weapons of mass destruction" issue. It's astounding, read the whole thing here.

These are my edited highlights. I hope they make you want to click the link and read more. Remember, knowledge is power.

"The laws of irony are strictly enforced. The first WMD we found was actually used against us. A roadside bomb filled with binary Sarin exploded near a convoy carrying ISG personnel. Sarin is a non-persistent nerve agent."

"But the physical evidence doesn’t tell the whole story. The interrogation portion does that. Many, many scientists talked about Saddam’s weapons production. The production wasn’t large scale, and it wasn’t quality stuff, but it was there. The question on your mind is this: where is the rest of the stuff?"

Note: I thought Syria hid a lot of material for Saddam before reading this, and mentioned it in my "Re-thinking" post. Well, isn't this interesting:

"According to the UN and every intel agency on the planet, right before the war 5000 big rigs worth of “stuff” crossed the border, never to be seen again.. What kind of stuff was this? I’ll give you a hint -- it’s stuff Saddam didn’t want captured."

"The problem with bio, chem, and nukes is that you don’t need many of them to cause a hell of a lot of problems for someone. And once you have them, it's incredibly easy to make more."

"But mostly, the moral of this story is that there was and IS WMD in Iraq. And the media could tell this story better then I can. But they don’t want to."

Of course all of this is confirmed in two books I have right here by my elbow - Plan of Attack by Bob Woodward and The Bomb in My Garden by Obeidi and Pitzer.

Someone said to me the other day "keep saying it and maybe after 500 times they'll start to believe it". Thing is, I'm in advertising so the wastage breaks my heart. Why can't a persuasive argument do the job more swiftly?

That's why the concept of a tipping point is so interesting.

Just a quick, further note. I found an interesting Independent newspaper article, via Little Green Footballs, read the article here.

"Charity cash for Palestinian poor was siphoned to suicide bombers"

"The charge sheet names two British charities, Human Appeal International and Interpal. Human Appeal is a broadly based fundraising organisation, currently helping victims of the Pakistani earthquake. Interpal describes itself as "a non-political, non-profit-making charity that focuses solely on the provision of relief and development aid to the poor and needy of Palestine". No one was available for comment at its London office yesterday."

"There is no doubt in police minds that Mr Salatna's arrest will be a major blow to those who rely on economic support from Hamas in order to carry out terrorist acts and to give their families financial backing."

That's something I've learned from studying the Michael Collins story - follow the money.

So Una, music and Michael Collins and if I can just think of a movie reference I'll have touched on all the old obsessions - hmmm - how about:

"I can't fight it any more. I ran away from you once. I can't do it again. I don't know what's right any longer. You'll have to think for both of us, for all of us."

Monday, November 28, 2005

Best British Blog

Today, in my book it's Harry's Place. I pop in a lot, while I'm opening mail and checking emails, and there's always a rip roaring discussion going on over something interesting.

All sorts of snarky people put in their two pence worth. I don't know the etiquette but check this out from the Ramsey Clark post's comment section, here's the link to get the full experience.

"I wonder why none of the bloggers on this site are not in the least bit interested in three recent major revelations of the Iraq debacle, namely the use of white phosphorous against civilians, the allegations that Bush wanted to bomb Al Jazeera, and the statement by Ayad Allawi that conditions in Iraq are as bad as they were under Saddam? Are these facts too inconvenient to your pro-war lefty position. Somewhat selective about what you talk about aren't you?

"Perhaps because:
a) White Phos is not a banned weapon and it wasn't used on civilians.
b) They are merely "allegations", printed by the same newspaper that gave us the photographic "proof" of British troops urinating on Iraqi detainees.
c) Allawi was not referring to coalition forces when he made his statement (of opinion, not fact, by the way).
How's that?"

Then more killer comments and:

"I want to bomb the BBC but I haven't, have I"

And:

"My "empirical judgement" is evidently different from yours. I regard free elections, a 25% female parliament and the absence of human fodder for industrial paper shredders as evidence of progress."

It's a rush to read the debate going on, and laugh out loud funny at times. Here's the link again, they're going at it as I type, click here.

Start the Week

How do others get their news? The only time a television news channel gets a look in with me is when I'm at the airport or the gym. I work very hard at ignoring tv news although I wish MTV had the good videos on the same heavy rotation that Sky News gives to their awful video footage.

Yesterday Sky showed the "shock, horror, Marines are beastly to each other" tape every ten minutes if it wasn't more often. I started to watch to see if the pixelations were that scrupulous or if they were going to miss sometimes and show us rather more than is strictly allowed. It's all about the exciting visual. It is not about providing a public service.

Andi, the Queen of all the Blogs she surveys, has a reminder about today's Pushbacking blogger:

"Gunn Nutt hosts the pushback for today, and he writes about something near and dear to my heart - protesting the protesters.

It's important, for the morale of our troops, that the anti-war crowd is countered at every turn. Given the scant media coverage of counter demonstrations, you might not know that these demonstrations take place. Sometimes, the counter demonstrators even outnumber the protesters. Of course, you would have to read blogs to know that. . . .

Tomorrow, Air Force Wife will host an active-duty guest blogger. "

Just a few bits from "Protesting the protesters", read the whole thing here.

"The MSM loves sensational "sexy" stories about corruption, graft, greed, murder and mayhem."

"Every so often their interest will be piqued by some "peace activists" who are receiving negative coverage in the blogosphere or "new media". Take for instance the FreeRepublic.com article by Kristinn Taylor about CodePink's $600K grant to Fallujah terrorists."

"It took Marc Morano's CNSNews article Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital to get some real attention. - August, 25 2005 - The Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., the current home of hundreds of wounded veterans from the war in Iraq, has been the target of weekly anti-war demonstrations since March. The protesters hold signs that read "Maimed for a Lie" and "Enlist here to die for Halliburton."...Among the props used by the protesters are mock caskets, lined up on the sidewalk to represent the death toll in Iraq."

You know, that's really unkind to do that outside a hospital.

I'm glad the blogging world is highlighting how appallingly those protestors behave. Wouldn't it be delightful if the news providers did so and were as funny and entertaining as PJ O'Rourke, who has a few things to say about demonstrations in his latest book, Peace Kills:

"Messages ranged from the disprovable (WE ARE ALL PALESTINIANS) to the dumbfoundingly true (TREES ARE NOT TERRORISTS)....what united these people, other than a general loserish quality? Or maybe it was only that. They've made every question a political question, because in politics - as this political demonstration proved - there is no quality control." p.136

Sunday, November 27, 2005

Boston, Massachusetts

When I was little, my mom's brother lived with his Irish wife and my four cousins in an eighteenth century house in Hingham outside Boston. We'd go there for Thanksgiving and I was impressed and intimidated by their east coast sophistication and the gourmet ingredients in the turkey stuffing.

We went to Cape Cod for our summer holidays and would visit the family graveyards in East Dennis. I was frightened by the seventeenth century headstones and fascinated by the great great grandmother who had three husbands. I have a necklace and earrings of hers.

I took all my old jewellery to the assessment department of the Victoria and Albert museum once, and the senior curator laid Ethelinda's necklace over his knee and kept stroking it. "This is the best, so American and so complex." Whatever that means.

One of my sisters moved to Boston after finishing university. She lived there for a few years, before marrying a BU guy and moving to California. I visited her there, followed the Freedom Trail, ate at Legal Seafood, partied a bit, but didn't really learn my way around.

Since then I've done qualitative focus groups there. You take a cab from the airport to an anonymous facility, chat to people with that accent, then fly off to the next fieldwork location. It is not a great way to get to know a place.

I once was hired by an advertising agency in Atlanta to develop a strategy for a mineral water from Boston. I could see the ads in my mind, Paul Revere dashing down the street, the battles of Lexington and Concord, "the water that inspired a revolution". I'd been living in England quite some time at that stage so then wondered if the nineteenth century wouldn't have more "healthy" values, Walden Pond, Louisa May Alcott and the literature scene indicating intellectual excellence.

The conventions of mineral water advertising are you're supposed to highlight the source. The source's attributes enhance the product. I had two positionings and started to do some research. That's when I discovered that a whole rethink was required. My sister suggested a further positioning about the age of mineral springs which did brilliantly in research and that won my agency the business.

The Boston radio station WRKO can be listened to or "streamed" over the internet. I've listened to the 'new media' talk show "Pundit Review" a few times. The two guys who broadcast, Kevin and Gregg, have interviewed some really interesting people. Their interviews are archived so you can go to their website and listen to their past interviews with famous bloggers like: Michelle Malkin, Michael Yon, Michael Medved, 'Blackfive', Hugh Hewitt, Jeff Goldstein of Protein Wisdom, Scott Johnson of Powerline and Ann Althouse, archived here.

I "called in" yesterday because I wanted to ask the two guys, who are real characters, what blogs they recommend. I got a bit caught out when they asked me a question about British media. What have I learned? Preparation would have helped. It was a logical follow on question. I'm not a sound bite kind of a girl. Well not yet.

Sunday update

The first section of the London Sunday Times has an article that mentions Michael Yon, read the whole thing here.

Translations

Giles: "Ah, (holds finger up) ahhhh, the Latin is translated from the Sumerian, and rather badly." Buffy Season Two. "When She was Bad"

My thoughts this morning are on how we translate what we hear and see into something that fits with our own worldview. It's also about intellectual curiosity, a theme Harry at Harry's Place started yesterday, read his story of a bottle of red wine and a book here.

We are dependent on others to provide us with information. We are dependent, to a certain extent, on the media to do as truthful a job as they are able. To report the relevant facts of a case in a succinct and memorable way.

The mainstream media decided some time ago to move to an indefensible, biassed position. Some link it to the time of Rushdie's fatwah but I only started noticing after watching BBC One for fifteen minutes on September eleventh.

In a very short time, just four years or so, internet blogs have joined the media scene. Some incredibly intelligent and knowledgeable people are compelled to put their alternative perspectives out to whomsoever is interested.

There isn't any comprehensive and scientifically valid market research on blogs yet, because the blog world keeps expanding in a rambunctious way. But anyone who knows how to examine market data and extrapolate could follow the internet/blog dynamic and see that something extraordinary is happening.

Here's an example - this past summer a woman who has been unhinged by her grief over the death of her soldier son in Iraq decided to join the zillions of others who demonstrate their beliefs in a mad cap but media friendly way. She did this by camping outside President Bush's holiday home in August.

People in England won't know about her because she never really got on the radar over here but she was the filler news item in the States for a long time.

So it is amazing to see the photographs of her recent book signing. And really rather sad. This is what she's come to, see the photos here.

Today's the only day I buy a paper, other than for long train journeys, so I'm off but will continue this theme later.

Friday, November 25, 2005

Sound of the Underground

We're living in historic times.

The main stream media is fragmenting before our eyes. Newspaper circulation is dropping and tv news audiences are decreasing. Brainwashing was a key discussion point at the last Cogers debate I attended. Everything feels different. It feels like people are getting it. No really.

I'm taking part in a citizen's "Push Back", that is, a set of bloggers have signed up to write on their assigned day on the subject of media bias towards the Iraq war and what we've discovered that contrasts with 'old media' reporting.

Our small undercurrent could be just the start.

What if every blogger, all 21 million of them including the 2 million in China, wrote one post this year, pointing out the flaws in a news story that they had direct knowledge of? I think it's happening now in a rather haphazard fashion. But what if that was the deal? No free blogger software unless you commit to writing just one post on the subject.

The Queen of our Push Back is Andi, at Andi's World. She's got so much on her plate right now, what was she thinking, coming up with this idea and geeing us all along?

It's a great idea. Today it's the turn of 'rightfielder', who's managed to find a couple of articles from 'old media' that report on the war in a new, improved way, read the whole thing here. One covers the increased engagement of the Iraqi population in the political process and one reports on the in-fighting going on between the terrorist groups.

I'm particularly interested in terrorists in Iraq who are foreigners and the second article has this interesting sentence: "Al Qaeda is dominated by non-Iraqis."

The mainstream media has a vested interest in this war. They've got a business to run. If they've got shocking stories to tell, their old data suggests this increases their audience. I'd like part of the push back to include pushing the off button.

"News stands for nothing educational worth seeing" Gavin de Becker, Fear Less, 2002

Thursday, November 24, 2005

Keep on Pushing

Push back Day Three and it's Doug Petch's turn, read his post here. It's all good but this phrase resonates: "isolated incidents presented without context".

Thing is, context is needed, otherwise you get people with short term memories proudly repeating the false 'atrocity of the day'. I use the term "short term memory" deliberately. Do you know why? What you've forgotten already?

Found a great article about Bill Roggio who's off now, soon to be "milblogging" from the coal face. Read it here. It lists three websites at the bottom, Michael's, Bill's group blog, www.threatswatch.org, and Andi, Queen of the Pushbackers.

Bad press brainwashes impressionable readers. It must be stopped. Threatswatch has an admirable list of objectives including this: "the press must be aided, rather than ignored, to bring clear and concise information to the public". What a beautifully diplomatic way of putting it.

I miss the whole Starbucks and morning paper ritual. Wouldn't it be amazing if the press became more of a 'public service', telling us the truth and the positive as well as negative. Oh and could it be as amusing as PJ, as erudite as Hitchens and as heartfelt as Michael Yon. Not too much to ask!

From Hugh Hewitt's book 'Blog':

"High consumers of information spend a significant part of every day searching for information on whatever subject concerns them...Moderate consumers of information...are not clueless, but neither are they passionate about staying ahead of the information curve."

Hugh's a sharp guy and has written a post on his blog recommending people not argue about politics during the Thanksgiving weekend.

This is my precis, making all of the points yes or no questions. Read the whole thing, which is very funny, here.

1. Refuse to argue, at least twice.
2. Agree to discuss the war only if you both can agree on a few facts (Note: refuse to be sidetracked from establishing agreement on these facts)
3. Ask if they recall Operation Desert Fox
4. Ask if they think President Clinton was lying when he gave his justification for bombing
5. Ask if they think the invasion of Afghanistan was successful
6. Ask if the US would be better off if it had removed the Taliban in 1997
7. Ask if they believe Bin Liner would have used WMD if he had them on September 11th
8. Ask if political leaders have to react differently to perceived threats post 9/11
9. Ask if Zarqawi trained in Afghanistan pre and post 9/11
10. Ask if they believe Sodhim's regime would have changed without outside intervention
11. Ask if Sodhim supported terrorists
12. At this point you'll know whether to excuse yourself from the conversation.

More Russell

Russell's wise words:

"Summarise. There was a lot of great thinking in every piece but it was often hard to find and a bit woolly. You always need to clearly summarise exactly what you're saying should be done. Ideally in a memorable, pithy way. Not only is that a good idea for communicating what you want to happen, but it forces you to interogate your idea and work out what's really good about it. Otherwise it's too easy to just do a list of quite good ideas."

He's analysed the last lot, read the whole thing here:

This is my take:

Use "research findings". I know nobody did any real research on this imaginary brand, but make some up. Expand on the target market. Make the person you want to buy it really come alive.

Few were in powerpoint chart form. Most got really wordy which is a danger I'm aware of so I will work at keeping my sentences short.

I liked the witty writing style of K and liked the idea of contrasting these beans with the CGI Heinz beans. L reported tons of "research" and used the trendy word-of-the-moment "disrupting". Note here, what about 'Ma'am's Beans'? Q had two great positioning ideas - "less farting" and "tested in the schoolyard". What would that make them, well hard? O had this great attribute for the target market, "not mean spirited".

The one I liked most was I. Started punchy and kept hitting. Great hints about the market opportunity to be gained from not having Heinz's additives. Richest market background of the bunch. I also loved the logo and pack visuals. Sometimes just having the competive packs on your desk can be inspiring. What confidence in the product, encourage trial and that will lead to success, just marvelous!

Russell's Planning School on the Web

"People learn the most when teaching others." Peter F. Drucker, 1909-2005

Russell Davies, planning professor and guru, has posted his thoughts on the first eight of the seventeen planning briefs he received for his first assignment, read everything here.

I'm going to throw down my first thoughts and impressions with this warning - I'm not as experienced or as diplomatic as Russell.

Overall:

I enjoyed reading Russell's comments much more than the briefs. He gives good advice and walks the walk too:

- "make me want to read the stuff"
"...more concise"
"...wasn't well summed up"
"...give memorable distillations of your thinking"

-- all of which would be great advice for a blogger, if she would only listen...

I disagreed with Russell on one point. There wasn't much (any) demonstration of "planning rigour".

I wanted someone to say "based on our original research" or "we used a new research methodology to explore attitudes" or "the competitive frame is huge and includes a spectrum of food stuffs from Pot Noodles (that slag) to elite epicurean microwaveable ready meals (that ponce).

I'm a big fan of ethnography and just starting to re-think how to apply psychological advances to the lowly group discussion plus ok, yes, bit of a math geek. So where was the data collection and analysis? In my book, that's Account Planning 101.

When I first thought about the assignment I came up with a number of positioning ideas:

1. The ultimate comfort food
2. The cutting edge/cult statusey baked bean
3. Mrs. Boolez as the Jo Malone of baked beans
4. The opposite of chocolate
5. The healthy slag of snacks

Original research would probably discover that none of those worked!

My reactions:

Of all the submissions I read, I liked the 'Great British Bean' positioning the best. It reminded me that Heinz = Teresa which probably didn't occur to the author. But the Boston Tea party wasn't a British political act so I got a bit sidetracked.

"We tell the truth" could be dangerous as beans = obesity could be a truthful statement.

I didn't like the idea of making a documentary of the brief. Good documentaries are hard to make, time consuming and expensive. A killer insight trumps everything.

Interesting idea - making "global warming" a good thing. After all, we are talking about beans.

I never saw the £5 million budget being used for tv. The media choice would be based on the key target market and I didn't see these uber beans being for "kids" or "younger people". That's where research provides inspiration and persuasion for alternative media.

Bottom line? Russell has given those planners and all of us, million dollar advice with no thought of reward.

Thank you on Thanksgiving Day.

Thanksgiving Day

John White, writing in 1630, about "the great migration" to the Bay Colony in Massachusetts:

"Necessity may press some, novelty draw on others, hopes of gain in time to come may prevail with a third sort; but that the most and most sincere and godly part have the advancement of the Gospel for their main scope I am confident."

David Hackett Fischer, writing about the social origins of the Puritan Migration in 'Albion's Seed':

"Other English plantations eagerly welcomed any two-legged animal (!) who could be dragged on board an emigrant ship. But Massachusetts chose its colonists with care. Not everyone was allowed to settle there. In doubtful cases, the founders of the colony actually demanded written proof of good character."

The environment was important:

"This cold climate proved a blessing. It created an exceptionally healthy environment for settlers from Northern Europe. Insect-born diseases such as malaria and yellow fever were less dangerous...Water-borne infections including typhoid fever and dysentery were much diminished by the cold temperatures of Massachusetts Bay."

"Cool temperatures and a variable climate created an immensely stimulating environment for an active population. European travelers repeatedly observed with astonishment the energy of the inhabitants. One visitor noted that New England children seem normally to move at a full run. Another remarked that their elders invented the rocking chair so they could keep moving even while sitting still."

"The Yankee twang (example: an added e so 'now' became a nasal neouw) did not develop in a perfectly uniform way...in Boston it was spoken at a speed which made it incomprehensible even to others of the same region."

"The ritual Thanksgiving dinner came mainly from the oven - baked Turkey, baked squash, baked beans, baked bread and baked pies in vast profusion. The pie, in particular, became a Yankee folk art."

"A fourth Puritan festival was Thanksgiving, which by 1676 had become an annual event, held on a Thursday in November...the first Thanksgiving in the Bay Colony happened on 22 February 1630 after provision ships arrived just in time to prevent starvation...by the late 1670s this event had become an autumn ritual, in which a fast was followed by a family dinner and another fast."

Albion's Seed, Four British Folkways in America, by David Hackett Fischer, Oxford University Press, 1989

Wednesday, November 23, 2005

Morning Notes

Pushback Day Two was yesterday and Toni of BearCreekLedger warms my heart with her historical references including an amazing New York Times editorial from 25 Sept 1945, read the whole thing here. I can't see anyone complaining about Stalin and we know what horrors he visited on his people, but hindsight is defined as "wisdom after the event" for a reason.

Russell Davies is trying to figure out how planners can share books on the web, read the whole thing here.

George (Oil-for-Food) Galloway has listed his additional income, other than what he receives for being an MP. This includes fees from the BBC of not quite £10,000 and a fee from RTE of not quite £5,000. It's amazing what the television tax covers, read the whole thing here.

Tuesday, November 22, 2005

And became famous on that day in November

I still love Postal Service, will check out Death Cab for Cutie in my "free time".

It’s ok if you’re a Brit and still wondering about this whole “blogging” idea. It’s slowly catching on in the States which means it will be another year or two before it becomes common currency here.

I am new to it myself. I started reading blogs at the end of the summer last year, when the media was gyro-flexing itself into new and unusual pasta shapes over the American presidential election.

But that's a subject for a different post.

Yesterday, Open Source Media listed fifty blogs in their "Who Knew?" Carnival and my submission "Re-thinking" got listed. Really interesting posts from some fantastic blogs so I'm thrilled to be in such company, read the whole thing here.

Andi of Andi's World is a blogger who was invited to Washington DC to present at a news conference that was highlighting the world of "milbloggers". I watched her clip as well as Michael Yon's, went to her - great - website and have signed up for her 14 day "Push Back". Read about it here.

She's put up the first post, to start the ball rolling, and it's a lot to live up to but I have until December 1st to get over my idea of exposing Sodhim Hussein for the D-list romance writer that he aspired to be! Andi's much more sensible and grown up post on US media bias is here.

See, it's not just the BBC who's biassed against the war in Iraq, although there's no excuse for the BBC which is funded by a tax on every tv set in the country. Weird or what? You queue up at the post office every year and buy a licence for your tv and this money goes to the BBC and no one else. So it's a tax, very simple concept to understand...

Therefore they don't have commercial pressure to gain and increase audience viewing figures. But they're all trying out for the well paid commercial stations, which explains the sensationalism, anti-Americanism and pro-terrorism stance. Prove me wrong! I'd be thrilled. What I am is late.

Sunday, November 20, 2005

Death in Mosul

From Little Green Footballs and how I hope it's true:

"At least one Arab television media outlet reported that Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, the head of the al-Qaida in Iraq, was killed in Iraq on Sunday afternoon when eight terrorists blew themselves up in the northern Iraqi city of Mosul.

The unconfirmed report claimed that the explosions occurred after coalition forces surrounded the house in which al-Zarqawi was hiding."


Here's the link.

Re-thinking it all





Re-thinking Iraq:

Before 'Bush Derangement Syndrome' there was 'Churchill Derangement Syndrome'.

Winston did not have the power often attributed to him but he is so high profile in the political maneuverings of the twentieth century that it's easier to blame him than look hard at what everyone else was doing.

From 'Churchill's Folly' I've learned that pressure from the Russians and French played a big part in the choice of boundaries for modern Iraq. The system of government was decided by Europeans who did not understand the religious make up of the territory and Winston was determined to reduce the cost of having a military presence in the middle east as quickly as possible.

But the fundamental problem with the way the middle east was set up after the first world war is that it was all based on monarchies which in fact means dictatorship - the polar opposite of democracy.





In 1921 the kings were crowned; Feisal in Iraq and Ibn Saud (who went on to conquer more territory to reign over) in Saudi Arabia and Abdullah in Transjordan with puppet parliaments that contained their relatives and friends.



Note: No king was chosen for "the Jewish settlement" although Feisal and Abdullah's father Hussein wanted to "extend the domains of his children into the main British mandate in Palestine". So Israel has the added distinction of not having had a monarch/dictator from the off, no wonder they're so feisty.

Bottom line, Winston wanted to sort out the middle east to the satisfaction of the first world war allies and withdraw British troops as quickly as possible to save money. Others at the 1921 Cairo Conference argued that removing the troops too quickly would leave the area and the monarchs themselves in a very difficult position.



Is it any surprise these monarchies did not allow freedom for all, still don't. You only have to look at Great Britain's still existing legislative body - the House of Lords - and her corrupt leasehold laws to see that monarchs and aristocrats will hold onto power as long as possible.



A monarchy/dictatorship is difficult to infiltrate for intelligence purposes as everyone with political power is either a relative or an intimate friend. Also, modern dictators have tended to be more ruthless than we can truly comprehend.

The way Sodhim Hussein controlled his country is well documented and ought to horrify every person with a spark of human kindness.












Christopher Hitchens calls pre-invasion Iraq "Saddam's ruined and tortured and collapsing Iraq" and explains in great detail here why he continues to write about "the permanent hell, and the permanent threat, of the Saddam regime."

"Surely the elementary lesson of the grim anniversary that will shortly be upon us is that American civilians are as near to the front line as American soldiers."

"Anyone with the smallest knowledge of Iraq knows that its society and infrastructure and institutions have been appallingly maimed and beggared by three decades of war and fascism."












Re-thinking our Military Intelligence:


Here is my, admittedly biassed, list of details about Iraq that we should have known, and as far as I can tell didn't know, before the start of the Iraq war:

- the role of Syria in hiding components and other material for Saddam relating to weapons of mass destruction

- that the inevitable resistance/insurgency would be strongly supported and funded by a wide range of terrorist groups, from Saddam and his family through to neighbouring countries that hoped to increase their territory and access to Iraq's resources when it ultimately collapsed.

- the clear, unequivocal links between Talibanism and Baathism.

- the existence and scope of the A.Q. Khan nuclear technology transfer network.

- the extent of UN corruption, espionage and incompetence which would have effected any "unannounced" visits to Iraqi cement factories, chemical plants, food-processing plants, military research centres, and so on.

- the link between 'Oil-for-Food' corruption and anti-invasion proponents like George Galloway



Sources:

Dr. Sanity, 'Bush Derangement Syndrome' link.
The Weekly Standard, A War to be Proud of, Christopher Hitchens, Sept 5 2005, link.
Churchill's Folly, How Winston Churchill Created Modern Iraq, Christopher Catherwood, 2004
Robin Cook, The Point of Departure, 2003
The Bomb in My Garden, Mahdi Obeidi & Kurt Pitzer, 2004
All postcards circa 1920

Friday, November 18, 2005

Michael Yon and Winston Churchill

Bit of a theme of mine this week, I know, but all the google searches link him to Bruce Willis so I'm fencing with the internet search engines. Blogging is great fun, who knew!

It's the end of the evening and there's been a lot to celebrate so I've finished by twisting the cork ever so gently from a non vintage bottle of Pol Roger, Winston's tipple of choice. I think he was related to the family. I belong to the Churchill Society and every quarter we get a glossy magazine that covers rare and unusual information about the great man, so I'm a mine of trivial information about Winston.

Non vintage doesn't have the crunchy bubbles but it does have the buttery taste and I feel armoured and ready to read Michael Yon's latest dispatch. Except tonight there are two - Americans Among Us and The Punisher's Ball.

Well, I'd completely forgotten my earlier admonishment, so sat down with the brimming flute and a highlighter and had to get up again for tissues within a minute of reading. It's laughter and tears all the way through.

All this talk of movie stars reminds me of my Bill Pullman story. Thank goodness I didn't drop the muffins. Hollywood stars do lend a certain spark to an event and it was incredibly cool of ole Bruce to pop along. Thing is, I always fancied Alan Rickman more (the villain in the first Die Hard movie), something about that English sneer, sorry, I digress!

I can't quite get over how right I was about Michael's writing in an earlier post, what is that, cognition? Still learning the high falutin' psychology terms.

But he's wrong when he calls his guys ugly, they're handsome and manly and such great eyes...so yes, the girls are gorgeous but THEY would have spent months getting ready. The guys would have spent one second shaving and gelling their hair and they look amazingly attractive.

And the telling line - "while others were already complaining of boredom with stateside life..." which I think nails it. I believe they say things like this to Michael because they know he understands that thinking. What I want to know is, how do these guys find, date and marry someone who just waits and waits for them, while they go zinging off to all points on the compass, I'm just saying.

His writing is poignant but not sentimental:

"The ghosts of the fallen took their places alongside widows and family..." I know this is true, if you look really hard you can see people materialise, ever so fleetingly.

"A mournful fog skirted the edge of the dance floor all night."

To absent friends and heros...good night.

Like a Swan in the Evening

This Monday is the anniversary of "Bloody Sunday", 21st November 1920.

This post isn't about the rights or wrongs of what Michael Collins was getting up to in Dublin in those far off days right after the First World war. Rather, it's just information I've gathered from a number of sources, with regard to a Sunday morning that started murderously and the days that followed.

I've only just started writing this up and I will go back and edit the posts I publish, I'm sure. It's very hard to write with the tone of voice I would use in the pub, late at night, when everyone's relaxed and in the mood for a story. So just pretend that's where you are...

Back then, a small handful of Irish people were plotting ways of attacking the British government in Ireland in order to provoke them into excessive retaliation that could be used against them. In addition, a daily propaganda sheet was mailed out to every newspaper editor and MP in England (forerunner of blogs?). Each envelope had to be mailed from a different post box as the British were scanning the mails in order to halt the flow of this information. When I walk around Dublin now, I see the old mailboxes and think "that one too".

The British government consulted with senior military officials who recommended forming a new intelligence service, made up of unemployed ex army officers. Their remit would be to track down, arrest and interrogate the key members of the Irish rebels, including the proscribed Dail members and the Irish "Republican army" that conducted ambushes and acts of destruction.

This new intelligence service is sometimes referred to as the 'Cairo Gang' in history books. This is usually attributed to the Cairo conference in 1921 or a cafe called the Cairo cafe that some of the secret service guys hung out in. But I think it's more straightforward than that.

During the First World War the British set up their Intelligence operations in Cairo. When the war ended, and a lot of those guys were out of work, they applied for and got jobs doing undercover work in Ireland. And the Irish guys who had been in the British Army during the war knew this and knew where these guys had come from.

There were many unemployed ex army officers in London so recruiting volunteers for undercover work in Dublin would not have been difficult. What is hard to understand is how the British military thought they could achieve any success in a town that, then as now, is small and friendly, with everyone looking out to see if they know you, or are related to you.

A group of men were sent over, some with links to Ireland, like Terrence Langrishe, ex Irish Guards and heir of Sir Hercules Langrishe, Baronet, of Knocktopher Abbey, co. Kilkenny. His good friend Peter Aimes, an ex Grenadier guard who gave his home address as New Jersey, was one of the leaders of this 'secret' police force.

Michael Collins was Director of Intelligence for the Irish Dail's army and he received information from a number of channels that this secret group was establishing itself in Dublin and other cities in Ireland. He ordered them to be watched and their movements noted. Some of those original notes survive.

The men he was watching wore civilian clothes but moved around after dark, after the curfew. Some historians believe this group struck first, assassinating the mayors of Limerick and Cork in their homes, but that can't be right as Cork mayor MacCurtain was killed in March and this group moved into Dublin in the summertime 1920. Maybe something unofficial was going on before that, I'll have to get out to Kew again as they keep opening up files that have been embargoed to this day.

Peter Aimes and Captain ? Bennett were part of a group that raided Vaughan's Hotel on Parnell Square in mid November. They questioned a number of residents, including two members of Michael Collins's intelligence staff who had been tracking their suspicious behaviour in order to determine whether they were part of the British intelligence group. That raid sealed their fate.

A British army informer who has never been identified and is sometimes thought to be a female secretary in Dublin Castle, kept Michael Collins informed of the secret group's objective, to find and murder Michael and all the people who worked with him. Thirty five men were identified as belonging to or aiding this secret intelligence group and this information was presented to the cabinet of the proscribed Dail who voted to assassinate as many as possible on the same day at the same time. I have never found any information about where this idea originated, but the received wisdom is that it was Michael Collins' idea. I certainly think he was ruthless enough, but it was a time in history when loss of life had lost a bit of meaning, after the unbelievably high casualties from the trenches.

Their addresses, mainly boarding houses, were watched and some serving people were recruited to help with tracking their movements. The men who would carry out the assassinations were advised to learn the layout of their targets' locations and carried out assessments disguised as plumbers, telephone engineers and so on.

Four days before the event, a final meeting was held with a number of Dail and Irish "army" members. Evidence regarding each man's likelihood of being a "spy" was discussed and the final list was whittled down to twenty names. Preparations were put in place to have each man shot at 9 am exactly on Sunday 21st November.

On the Saturday, Michael Collins intended to spend the night at Vaughan's Hotel. However, late in the evening he was advised by the hall porter that something wasn't right and he left the hotel quickly, moving down the street to number 38, where a friend had a flat on the top floor. Shortly after this, the hotel was raided and a couple of residents were arrested and taken away. That night he lay awake underneath the trap door leading to the roof of the house, ready at anytime to pull down the ladder and escape across the rooftops if his location was raided.

A few years ago, number 38 Parnell Square was a hotel and I stayed there on Saturday the 20th of November. My window faced west and I could see St. Dominick's church and the jumbled roofs of the houses on Parnell Street just to the south. I looked at the trap door above the stairs on the top floor and thought about what it would be like to go back in time and see what had happened that night. The following morning was clear and cold, no more than 9 degrees but without a wind so it wasn't uncomfortable. Bells ring out all over Dublin these days. It would have been the same on that morning in 1920.

According to James Gleeson in his book 'Bloody Sunday', on that morning an assassin going up the stairs at the Shelbourne Hotel got spooked by his reflection in a mirror, fired and alerted the British secret agent who fled from his room.

All over Dublin, men were lined up to knock on doors precisely at 9 o'clock.

I've tracked down all the addresses and it isn't that easy as most of the relevant house numbers have been removed. I remember getting quite cross about that, which just goes to show that even doing research can distract from the point of it all, that these were murder scenes.

And the day job intervenes, so more later...

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

Michael Yon and Sherlock Holmes

Michael Yon's latest post is up, this is the link to his website. The email with the link arrived last night and it's still sitting in my mailbox, unclicked, unread. I just know it's going to be hard to take and I want to live in my happy bubble for one more day.

Every post he writes tells about something new or under reported. He's always teaching about what he himself has learned and it oft times makes for very uncomfortable reading. His writing style is unlike anything on the web, both very intimate and compelling, which makes the sad information all the more devastating.

Some of the discussion at work yesterday revolved around basic human needs, including the fundamental need to be desired. We got very esoteric and academic and it was great fun.

Michael writes as if he's moved on beyond that. He doesn't have any insecurity about being desired so he's comfortable letting his guard down in a way that no guy I've ever known has done. I've perceived that kind of higher consciousness among the great artists and I believe Michael's on a level with some of the finest writers and poets of the last couple of centuries. We get to live and watch him develop as an artist and this must have been what it was like to live in the days when Yeats published his poetry or the Beatles launched a new album.

Also, possibly, similar to the public reactions to Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's literary creation, Sherlock Holmes. Conan Doyle didn't write the Holmes stories with anything like the attention to detail he gave to his more "literary" works. But Sherlock caught the imagination of the public and so he would be induced to write another, even bringing Holmes back from the dead after trying to kill him off. To this day, tons of readers revel in the Holmes stories and there are biographies and books of literary criticism still storming the book charts.

I don't believe any great work of artistic merit is easily produced. Some artists make it look easy and some probably think they didn't work that hard but great art, like great love, takes a long time to develop.

"It was the end of November, and Holmes and I sat, upon a raw and foggy night, on either side of a blazing fire in our sitting-room in Baker Street..."There only remains one difficulty. If Stapleton came into the succession...how could he claim it without causing suspiciion and inquiry?"

"It is a formidable difficulty, and I fear that you ask too much when you expect me to solve it. The past and the present are within the field of my inquiry, but what a man may do in the future is a hard question to answer."

The Hound of the Baskervilles, page 145, first published August 1901.

Open Source Media Launch

I've just listened in and Claudia Rosett, "formerly" of the Wall Street Journal has agreed that the New York Times online is just an online blog, "with one difference, they get paid for it". This is something I hear so much from 'old media' sources and it cracks me up. They don't really 'get paid' for anything. They are one of many venues for advertising. Advertising placed in the newsprint edition supplies some of the money for wages. Other companies in the group also supply money for wages, especially if you write for the Guardian.

In the old days advertising was placed where the desired target market could be found. Now that the blog world has supplied an alternative to 'old media' and numerous exposes of the bias and fraudulent reporting of news stories, some of the most valuable target audiences are to be found elsewhere. This trend will continue, along with declining circulation, until 'old media' figures out that anything other than objective and truthful reporting is bad for business.

If you want to listen to the launch party, click here.

My love affair with Dublin

I think it is perfectly reasonable to love a town. Places can have personalities and changing looks the same as friends who, over the years, get better with age.

Dublin is getting better with age, with a vengeance. When I first started going there it was charming for all the wrong reasons. Everything was grubby and old fashioned, just a bit tacky and disreputable and it felt like London did when I first started coming here as a gormless midwestern high school kid. I loved the dark, dirty pubs and dusty bookstores. And the typos! Dublin then had permanent fixtures and museum exhibitions and even the posters on the street, all had their typos. Even the monument on Michael Collins's grave has a typo.

As I started studying Irish history, I enjoyed spotting the mislabellings too. But I wouldn't be saying this if I didn't love the place with all my heart. Because now, the transformation that's going on is incredibly exciting and I feel the same way I would if a friend was joining the stratosphere in their career. Couldn't happen to a nicer place.

There's still the incredible friendliness and banter. The man at passport control, the coffee shop workers and girls clustered round the mirror in the loo at the pub. You have to have a few quips to hand at all times. Everyone everywhere is looking you full in the face and quite a few people raise their eyebrows and nod at me, so I return the favour, it's only polite.

But what's happening on either side of the Liffey is simply amazing. It's everything Canary Wharf wants to be, but a ten minute walk from the central bits of 'the Northside' or Trinity and Grafton Street (ok I walk fast). Even the little cluster of buildings - "Canary Dwarf!" - fit into the landscape exquisitely. The office I was in was right on the river, just across from the reproductions of old sailing vessels, and the light at every point of the day was arresting but did not prepare me for lighting up time. The old and the new work in beautiful harmony and I feel happy about Dublin's march towards modernity, you wear it well.

Tuesday, November 15, 2005

Back from Dublin

My resolution - not to drink and blog - means I won't be writing much about the gorgeous city of Dublin and the sensible, let me say common sense filled Irish people who reside there. Well not til tomorrow anyway.

Monday, November 14, 2005

PJ nails everything

PJ O'Rourke, a rock solid midwesterner, albeit from Ohio, covers the Tory leadership guys, the French riots, the value of democracy and the wit and wisdom of Ronald Reagun, all in one little article, read it here.

In for a penny

John Griffiths has put up a couple of new things at his trail blazing account planning site, including a throw away line about having presented at the Grand Hyatt in Amman earlier this year. He's got a review of a book that didn't grab me but I'm really impressed with the technology used, such as audio of different bits of his interview with the author. You can read the November newsletter here.

This is interesting:

"AOL is diving deeper in the TV business, announcing today that it will begin distributing episodes of more than 300 television series starting in January. The episodes will be available at AOL.com's new In2TV broadband network, and they will be free...with very limited advertising...The shows will be categorized onto six channels within the In2TV network according to genre."

Read the whole thing here.

Sunday, November 13, 2005

Quick note

Ok, can I be really mean for a minute? Have you seen the footage of the woman who was supposed to blow herself up with her husband in Amman? The story is, her belt "didn't work" so he pushed her out of the room and ran into the wedding reception to blow himself up without her.

All the different scenarios run through my head and they're all really mean. Like, she says she's 35 but have you seen her? Or how about, if he's going to have 72 virgins to play around with, does he want his wife around too? Or be there while she gets the equivalent (what is the equivalent by the way, because if it's 72 virgins then that's one of the reasons these women are a rarity).

If he really was determined to cause mayhem rather than win something for himself in whatever afterlife he's been brainwashed to think he goes to...wouldn't he have grabbed her hand as blowing himself up would have activated her bomb belt and it would have been a much more devastating explosion.

Remembrance Sunday

BBC One, eleven a.m. and the bong of Big Ben. Then the two minute silence broken by the cannon fired at Horse Guards. "One one thousand, two one thousand, three...and the boom sounds outside my window. Two and a half miles. That's about right. It sounds like a weapon of war. So do fireworks which I hate with a passion.

Then the march past with David Dimbleby doing his usual fine job of describing the scene. "For the first time ever, US Marines have joined in the marching". Enormous shoulders in bright red coats with red berets.

This is what the BBC does so well. I do like the BBC Natalie. Touching the Void and the classical music documentary filmed at Auschwitz - same DP - are stupendous, world beating pieces of art and make the licence fee almost worth it. Actually, totally worth it as I love all the co-productions with HBO too.

Then a fine cup of Whittard chai tea and the Sunday Times. AA Gill writes about British war memorials and I am amazed at the stories he tells, read the whole thing here.

His description of the memorial on platform one at Paddington is so moving. What he doesn't say is that at this time of year, that part of the station is dark, dank and chilly with birds flying overhead and a few poppies scattered at the feet of the enormous bronze sculpture. His feet are at eye level and you gaze up in wonder. I never knew:

"The soldier stands waiting for a train, his helmet set at an angle, his greatcoat slung over his shoulder, the collar turned up. He's wearing the muffler his mother knitted for him, and he's looking down at a letter. He holds it gently, saving the envelope - it will have to sustain many readings. His face shows no outward emotion, it has that concentrated calm we use for letters and hymn sheets, and standing for the two minutes silence."

Friday, November 11, 2005

Eleventh Day of the Eleventh Month

Remembrance Day. When I was a romantical teenager I used to copy out poems to memorise, including "In Flanders Fields". I can remember every word of that poem - "that mark our place and in the sky" - "loved and were loved" - all of it was designed to make the heart ache.

There are some pop tunes like that, especially some recent Neil Finn ones and some from his Crowded House days. And then there are the pop tunes that are the soundtrack for past loves. Some make my heart ache so much I can't actually listen to them.

One thing that makes my heart ache these days is thinking about soldiers who have fought and died so that I can live this incredibly free and sensuous life. In fact, all of the people in history who worked towards a goal they didn't know they would achieve, "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness".

I'm thrilled and heartbroken by:

The stoicism of the soldiers of General Washington's Continental Army who left bloody footprints on the icy roads of New Jersey as they marched to oust the British from Trenton at Christmastime 1776.

The prescience of George Washington who said, upon learning that he had been unanimously voted commander-in-chief of the army in June 1775, "...from the day I enter upon the command of the American armies, I date my fall, and the ruin of my reputation." We think highly of him now but he had a terrible time during the revolution.

The flexibility of Thomas Paine, an English radical and pamphleteer, who "hated war with the passion of his Quaker forebears" but believed that, just maybe, some "evils in the world were even worse than war" and who wrote so eloquently in December 1776, "these are the times that try men's souls".

The cleverness of Betsy Ross (for I know in my heart it was she) "a beautiful young widow" who wined and dined the 36 year old Hessian aristocrat Colonel von Dunop in her house in Mount Holly on the 23rd, 24th and 25th December when he should have been moving his troops to Bordentown, a place six miles from Trenton, chosen so that he could support the town against any attack.

There's a great book that covers that period, 'Washington's Crossing' by David Hackett Fischer, 2004.

He's very careful to say that no one knows if the woman who distracted Dunop was Betsy but doesn't it make sense? Can't you see her, late in the evening over supper, just a few candles and the firelight, pouring out the good claret and bantering, just a bit, and sympathising enormously and flirting in the coolest way?

The horrors of the Iraq war and the terrorism war are so gobsmacking to us because of the devastating power of modern technology. But in those days there was no quick communication, medical advances or food and fuel available in an instant. They had to be mentally resilient and resolute. This makes me feel humble and grateful.

Thursday, November 10, 2005

Newspaper Circulation continues to...

I read it at Samizdata. I followed the link to thelongtail.com. This is the really short version:

Percentage change in weekday circulation for a handful of the top 20 biggest US newspapers, Mar-30Sep2005 v. same period 2004.

USA Today - down 0.6%
The Wall Street Journal - down 1.1%
The New York Times - up 0.5%
Los Angeles Times - down 3.8 %
The Washington Post - down 4.1%
San Francisco Chronicle - down 16.4%

Don't get too excited about the NYT, that's less than 5,000 on sales of 1.2 million.

I used to love reading the left behind newspapers on tubes and trains. Now I won't read the rubbishy ones even if they're free. Neither will anyone else. The Times and The Standard got scooped up and everything else was left on the train tonight.

It's happening in American. It's happening in the UK. Thank goodness for blogs. We bloggers wear our hearts on our sleeves and supply links to our sources. If something sounds far fetched you can track things back and make up your own mind.

It's a new age all right.

Wednesday, November 09, 2005

The shock of it all

This is absolutely unbelievable. I've just read that George Galloway went to the House of Commons and voted today. Is this the first time he's voted since the session started? His voting record is the poorest of any MP, wish I could supply the link but I'm depending on my memory here.

That's the story, not Tony Blair's quixotic bid, which he knew he would lose, if not in the Commons, certainly in the House of Lords.

I'll bet the Prime Minister did this so we could see the true colours of the Tory party. They are as feeble an opposition party these days as the Democratic party is in the States.

The Penguin 'Great Ideas' series includes a David Hume booklet 'On Suicide' with this quote on the front:

"I believe that no man ever threw away life while it was worth keeping."

While paging through it I found this quote:

"...when the mind operates alone, and feeling the sentiment of blame or approbation, pronounces one object deformed and odious, another beautiful and amiable; I say that, even in this case, those qualities are not really in the objects, but belong entirely to the sentiment of the mind which blames or praises."

"Except in this instance, when I am clearly right and you are clearly wrong." You didn't think I'd end with a Buffy quote, did you.

Tuesday, November 08, 2005

Cold as the March wind his eyes

The votes are counted at normblog.

W.B. Yeats at number one. All's right with the world.

Voting for Bloggers

This is a fun idea. A blogger in the Holly Wood Hillz is running a competition to attribute famous bloggers to the various suits and designations in a deck of cards. Go to this link here if you want to vote.

I've updated my links list, deleted a few, added a few, check them out if you have time.

Punters in Cambridge

Here's a blogger's write up of George Galloway's performance in Sheffield yesterday. It's really funny, here's the link.

I went to Cambridge instead, to attend the first ever session of the Cambridge Society of Cogers. The company was brilliant and the setting was outstanding. It's exactly one hour from London's King Cross which is fifteen minutes longer than a bad day going from Kensington to the Aldwych. So I intend to go back.

Not least because a friend has explained to me how you can find interesting lectures to attend and be granted admittance. I bought the 'Cambridge University Reporter' (£2.40, what a bargain!) and definitely intend to go to a couple of the Social and Developmental Psychology lectures - Language and communication and Language and theory of mind, in particular.

While in the queue at the quirky college bookstore (Heffers) I couldn't resist picking up a couple of little brochures by the cash register - "Reading for study", "How to write essays". It cracks me up, this concept of little £1 brochures sitting right there, because it's the same thing that happens in supermarkets, except there it's chocolate and in book lover land it's little booklets on how to learn. Well, I found it funny anyway.

Heffers had more than 20 recently published books on Nelson or Trafalgar and hundreds of recently published books on the Middle East. I've never seen so many and I am a book store addict. They had very little modern fiction and that's as it should be. There's a big Borders by the marketplace for that kind of thing. But they did have Mauve Binchy so there's no excuse Polly.

Monday, November 07, 2005

Psychology of the News

I've got a favour to ask.

I'm writing a proposal for a research project that will explore people's attitudes to the news. If you don't mind I'd like to interview you. The first stage of my research is about understanding the role of "news" in your life. But to do that, I'd like to know what news you watched or read or just comprehended, when you were little and how that's progressed up to the present day.

It's a lot to ask, I know!

Since I believe most of my gentle readers are friends and family, please let me know when I can talk to you by phoning or emailing me. Let me know if you'd prefer I call you or whether you'd be happy to fill in an opened ended email questionnaire.

If you've lost my contact details, drop me a line at planningblog - at - aol dot com and I'll drop you a note.

Many thanks for even considering it!

Sunday, November 06, 2005

Is Paris Burning?

If you live in London, as I do, there are countless times in the year when someone says "let's go to Paris", "so and so's flat is empty", "meet me there for a few days before I head off to -", "I've got this really great deal on Eurostar, Air France, bmi..." and you find yourself talked into visiting the place yet again.

I visited the time x was staying in the Hotel Meurice and we ate chef salad in Angelina every day followed by backstage passes and glamorous people to hang out with...I couldn't stop thinking, "Nazis worked here, ate here. Nazis took this lift". If you've read "Is Paris Burning" you know what I'm referring to.

If not, I'll just remind you. When the allies broke out of Normandy and headed east, the Nazis had to pull back and Hitler sent a telegram to torch Paris. This was received by General Choltitz at the SS headquarters in the Hotel Meurice. He ordered troops to mine all the beautiful and famous bits of Paris, from Les Invalides and all the medieval churches to the four concrete and steel supports of the Eiffel Tower. Then he dithered.

Meanwhile, Colonel Andre Vernon of the Free French lot decided to telephone a "wholly imaginary news bulletin" announcing that the city had "liberated itself" to the BBC, reasoning correctly that there would be no good excuse not to move allied forces into the city.

From the first Eisenhower knew that saving Paris was not a worthwhile military objective. "The capture of Paris will entail a civil affairs commitment equal to maintaining eight divisions in operation." p.20

There is a strong argument that if Patton's Third Army had been able to use the petrol that was spent getting to Paris in his dash to and over the Rhine, the Nazis would not have had time to pull back and entrench and it would have taken far less than the nine months it took to reach Berlin and end the war.

The book is great: Is Paris Burning by Larry Collins and Dominique LaPierre, 1965.

See why I like history so much? Things don't change much do they - Plus ca change indeed.

Thursday, November 03, 2005

Life during wartime

Project Valour IT is an interesting charity that I'd like you all to consider contributing to. You can give really small amounts through paypal and every bit helps.

I'm so intrigued by the 'blogosphere', as you know if you know me. So I'll say this - if you contribute anything through that paypal link over there to this really cool charity, which is working to provide voice activated laptops for wounded soldiers with hand and arm injuries, then I'll take you for a drink.

That's a straightforward proposition if you live in London. For my Stateside friends, well, we'll have to put something in the diary.

As you know, the Churchill is my favourite pub, but you give a donation, you name the location. Can't say fairer than that.

Wednesday, November 02, 2005

Charity for Remembrance Day

Thanks for putting up the code? in the code? whatever you did Jeremy, I really appreciate it.

I've just added a charity link for "IT for Soldiers", read about it here. This is in honour of Remembrance Day or Veteran's Day as it's called in the States.

I buy a poppy most days, one of the lovely charity events in England. This goes back to 1919, when Lloyd George left a bunch of red poppies beside the temporary Cenotaph on Whitehall. Or so the story goes. I always cry on Remembrance Sunday, the last post played while all those veterans look on, so touching.

This is in addition to collecting for the Royal National Institute for the Blind, please call or email me if you want any Christmas raffle tickets, plenty left and the deadline is 7 December.

Russell's first assignment

The first ever assign